Original Articles

Can Large Language Models Support Endodontic Decision-Making? Accuracy and Consistency of ChatGPT and Gemini in Deep Caries and Pulp Exposure

Volume 5 Publish Date: May 7, 2026
Full Text PDF
DOI
Vasfiye Işık ORCID
Department of Endodontics, İstanbul University-Cerrahpaşa Faculty of Dentistry, İstanbul, Türkiye
Soner Şişmanoğlu ORCID
Department of Restorative Dentistry, İstanbul University-Cerrahpaşa Faculty of Dentistry, İstanbul, Türkiye
Mehmet Baybora Kayahan
Department of Endodontics, İstanbul University-Cerrahpaşa Faculty of Dentistry, İstanbul, Türkiye
Işık, V., Şişmanoğlu, S., & Baybora Kayahan, M. (2026). Can Large Language Models Support Endodontic Decision-Making? Accuracy and Consistency of ChatGPT and Gemini in Deep Caries and Pulp Exposure. Essentials of Dentistry, 5, 1–7. https://doi.org/10.5152/EssentDent.2026.25113
Full Text Full Text PDF

Abstract

Background: This study evaluated the accuracy and consistency of responses generated by 2 large language models (LLMs), ChatGPT and Gemini, regarding the management of deep carious lesions and pulp exposure in endodontics.

Methods:
Fifty dichotomous (Yes/No) questions were developed based on the position statement of the European Society of Endodontology and distributed across 5 categories: Diagnosis and Classification, Caries Management, Pulp Exposure Management, Materials and Techniques, and Follow-up and Prognosis. Questions were presented to ChatGPT-4o and Gemini (Flash 2.5) on 3 occasions, 1 week apart. A total of 300 responses were collected and compared with reference answers. Accuracy was measured as the proportion of correct responses, while consistency was assessed using Fleiss’ Kappa across time points. Statistical analyses included Cochran’s Q and McNemar’s test, with significance set at P < .05.

Results:
ChatGPT achieved an overall accuracy of 76.7%, while Gemini achieved 86.0%, a statistically significant difference favoring Gemini (P=.034). By categories, Gemini showed superior accuracy in Caries Management and Pulp Exposure Management (96.7%), while ChatGPT performed best in Diagnosis and Classification (93.3%). Substantial consistency was observed for both models (Fleiss’ Kappa=0.627 for ChatGPT; 0.723 for Gemini). Gemini’s accuracy varied significantly across weeks (P=.015), whereas ChatGPT’s remained stable (P=.670).

Conclusion:
Both LLM-based chatbots demonstrated moderate accuracy and high consistency in endodontics. While results highlight their potential as educational and decision-support tools, current performance remains insufficient for reliable clinical application. Domain-specific training and further refinement are necessary before widespread implementation in endodontic practice.

Cite this article as: Işık V, Sismanoglu S, Kayahan MB. Can large language models support endodontic decision-making? Accuracy and consistency of ChatGPT and Gemini in deep caries and pulp exposure. Essent Dent. 2026, 5, 0113, doi:10.5152/
EssentDent.2026.25113.

Article Info
Published In
Journal Essentials of Dentistry
Volume / Issue Volume 5
Pages 1-7
History
Published Online May 7, 2026
Affiliations
Vasfiye Işık ORCID
Department of Endodontics, İstanbul University-Cerrahpaşa Faculty of Dentistry, İstanbul, Türkiye
Soner Şişmanoğlu ORCID
Department of Restorative Dentistry, İstanbul University-Cerrahpaşa Faculty of Dentistry, İstanbul, Türkiye
Mehmet Baybora Kayahan
Department of Endodontics, İstanbul University-Cerrahpaşa Faculty of Dentistry, İstanbul, Türkiye
Cite this Article
Işık, V., Şişmanoğlu, S., & Baybora Kayahan, M. (2026). Can Large Language Models Support Endodontic Decision-Making? Accuracy and Consistency of ChatGPT and Gemini in Deep Caries and Pulp Exposure. Essentials of Dentistry, 5, 1–7. https://doi.org/10.5152/EssentDent.2026.25113
Share
Outlines