Evaluation of the Practice Differences Between Dentists in Fixed Prosthesis Procedures

Abstract

Background: Fixed prostheses are widely used in the rehabilitation of missing teeth. The success of these restorations depends on various factors, including impression techniques, gingival retraction, interocclusal records, and temporary prosthesis fabrication. This study aimed to evaluate the knowledge, attitudes, and practice variations among dentists in Türkiye regarding fixed prosthesis procedures.

Methods: This study was conducted via an online survey. The questionnaire consisted of 14 questions covering demographic characteristics and fixed prosthodontic procedures, including gingival retraction, impression materials, interocclusal records, and temporary prosthesis fabrication. Statistical analyses were performed using IBM SPSS (IBM SPSS Corp.; Armonk, NY, USA, Version 23.0), with a significance level of P < .05.

Results: A total of 152 dentists participated, of whom 61.8% were female and 38.2% were male. Gender did not significantly influence material or technique selection (P > .05), whereas educational background and professional experience significantly affected the choice of impression materials (P < .05). Condensation silicone was the most preferred impression material (54.6%), and wax was the most frequently used interocclusal record material (75.8%). Additionally, 94.7% of dentists fabricated temporary prostheses, with the indirect technique being the most preferred.

Conclusion: Significant variations were observed in material and technique selection, particularly based on education and experience. While younger dentists showed a higher preference for modern materials, experienced practitioners relied more on conventional techniques.

Cite this article as: Bilgi Özyetim E, Yıldırım G, Güven MÇ. Evaluation of the practice differences between dentists in fixed prosthesis procedures. Essent Dent. 2025; 4, 0035, doi: 10.5152/EssentDent.2025.25035.